TOPIC — Assessment (formed YYYY-MM-DD)

Overview

Compare this area to common good practice, score it (Table 2), and track prioritized gaps (section 4.3).

Scope and methodology

…

Table: Reference practices

Legend: use table.audit-ref-table. …

…

Table: AS-IS situation

One row per Table 1 practice. …

Use table.audit-score-table. Columns: #, Practice, Evidence / notes, Justification, Score (td.score-excellent|score-good|score-needs-attention).

…

Scoring summary

Narrative overall (Table 2 judgment)

Overall (our guess, …): about X / 10.
To move toward top decile: … — see section 4.3 (Top five gaps).

Weighted axis model (explicit arithmetic)

Optional cross-check: show reproducible math that is not the same as the narrative headline in §4.1 (which may weight importance). Pick one style and stick to it:

• Docs (DX) style: a small set of axes with fixed weights summing to 100%; table columns Axis, Weight, Score, Contribution (weight × score); total row → ≈ headline.
• API style: unweighted mean of all Table 2 row scores; table columns Step, Operation, Figures, Result; total row for the explicit mean.

Interpretation (optional): one short paragraph reconciling the explicit arithmetic with the narrative score.

Top five gaps — priority and workflow status

Status colours: TODO (not started), IN PROGRESS (owned work in flight), DONE (accepted in main). Update started / closed / PR when you pick up or finish work.

Page history

Page history